|
Mau Forest Residents Decry
Violent Evictions
By Michael Tiampati
July 15, 2005
Twelve-year-old Nicholas Kiptum was
traumatized when Kenyan police destroyed his school in early June.
A member of the Kipsigis community,
Kiptum described the police action as "brutal, horrific and
inhuman ... those people did not spare even schools and learning
materials."
Sanctioned by the Kenyan cabinet,
police forcibly evicted an estimated 2,750 families, about 10,000
people, and burned homes in the Narok District of the Mau Forest
complex. The eviction destroyed seven primary schools, affecting
2,721 students.
"The decision to evict
followed a six-month study by a government task force that looked
into the problem of encroachment in Mau Forest," Mary Ngaruma,
a spokeswoman for the Ministry of Lands and Housing, told
Integrated Regional Information Networks (IRIN).
The Forest Action Network (FAN)
said the Narok County Council authorized the evictions to
rehabilitate the forest's environment. FAN also notes on their
website that the justification for the evictions was based on
questionable land allocations.
According to a report on illegal
and irregular land allocations by Kenya's President Mwai Kibaki,
commonly referred to as the Ndung'u Report, about 200,000 land
title deeds throughout Kenya were issued fraudulently following
Kenya's independence.
The report said, "Land [after
independence] was no longer allocated for development purposes but
as political reward and ... 'land grabbing' became part and parcel
of official grand corruption through which land meant for public
purposes ... has been acquired by individuals and corporations."
The Ndung'u Report recommends
amending Kenya's constitution to pave the way for the formation of
a Lands Title Tribunal to facilitate the revocation and
rectification of all title deeds in question.
Ben Ole Koissaba, a spokesman of
the conglomerate of non-governmental organizations called Maa
Civil Society Forum (MCSF), accuses the government of
"implementing the recommendations [of the Ndung'u Report]
piecemeal and selectively, often targeting the poor farmers,
pastoralists and hunter-gatherers holding valid title deeds"
in favor of rich landowners.
Ole Koissaba said that the Kenyan
Ministry of Lands justified the evictions by dismissing the title
deeds held by eviction victims as merely "papers." The
MCSF said that accordingly, titles held by big ranchers in Nakuru,
Narok, Laikipia, and Transmara districts should also be revoked.
Joseph Misoi, a former Kalenjin
civil leader, said that Narok District Commissioner Farah Hassan
who ordered the police actions and the Kenyan Ministry of Lands
violated a court order from March barring it from evicting people
from Mau forest until the matter was heard and determined in the
High Court in Nairobi.
Maasai elder Taki Ole Minchil,
whose community was affected by the evictions, said that the
institutions that issued the questionable titles in the Mau
Forest, including the Narok County Council, must be held
accountable. While Ole Minchil acknowledged the importance of
protecting the country's indigenous forest cover, he added that
those evicted deserve compensation for land, property, and trauma,
or an offer of land elsewhere.
"We were treated like
criminals, enemies of the state who deserved no future even though
we have title deeds for the ownership of these lands,"
lamented 60- year-old Kiptum Arap Koech, a victim of the evictions
in Mau complex in Narok district.
According to a joint report by the
Department of Resource Survey and Remote Sensing and the Kenya
Forests Working Group, titled Changes in Forest Cover in
Kenya's Five "Water Towers," 2000-2003, the Mau
Forest ecosystem, approximately 900 square kilometers, is one of
Kenya's important water sources and the largest indigenous forest.
It forms the upper catchment for seven rivers that feed the
sprawling Maasai Mara grasslands and regional Natron and Victoria
lakes.
The report concludes that the Mau
complex spanning four Kenyan districts—Kericho, Nakuru, Bomet,
and Narok—is in rapid decline due to human deforestation.
Daniel Ole Ng'osila, an Ogiek from
Nkareta, said he agreed that forest cover is important in
maintaining pastoralists' dry-season grazing, as a source for
rivers, and also to sustain Ogiek livelihoods. But he said the
evictions were "despotic and tyrannical," and that the
affected people had the right to be involved fully in the planning
and implementation process to avoid the mayhem and destruction
that ensued.
According to Kenya's The Nation,
the Kenyan government recently donated Sh4.9 million (US$64,200)
to schools hosting the displaced pupils, and philanthropic
organizations were chipping in. The U.N. Children's Fund (UNICEF)
contributed 3,000 books, pens, and other learning materials and
the Kenyan Red Cross Society gave blankets and utensils to
families camped out in the July winter cold.
It will be a long time before the
full impact of the evictions fade from the minds of many pupils.
Nicholas Kiptum has no kind words for those who sanctioned the
operation: "Even in the Stone Age, learning institutions
would have been spared. Those that ordered these atrocities are
not worthy of forgiveness."
Michael Tiampati is the media
liaison for the Maa Civil Society Forum (MCSF).
Weekly
Indigenous News
|