|
May 23, 2001
Forest of controversy grows in
Kenya
A plan to allow settlement in
protected woodlands draws allegations of political corruption.
By Danna Harman
Special to The Christian Science Monitor
NAIROBI, KENYA
In its annual edition chronicling
corruption, the popular Kenyan daily "The Standard"
accuses the government this year of the usual misdeeds - from
nepotism to blackmail to theft. But a new allegation also surfaced:
President Daniel Arap Moi is accused of sacrificing virgin forest
for political gain.
The article echoes an outcry by
environmentalists, opposition politicians, and the public here
against a government decision to parcel out some 168,000 acres -
10 percent - of Kenya's protected woodlands.
"It is difficult to understand
the logic behind this government decision," says John
Githongo, head of the Kenya office of the anti-corruption watchdog
Transparency International, "except that land is the most
valuable patronage resource available today ... and it's a safe
assumption that this is politically motivated."
| |
 |
FOREST
WATERS:
Masai herders set up a makeshift trough in July for their
drought-stressed herd in a forest near Mt. Kenya, a
water-catchment area where trees would be cut under the
new plan.
BORIS GRDANOSKI/AP/FILE |
The government denies using forest
lands for patronage, and says the areas will be used to resettle
landless people.
Critics say that cutting down the
trees will worsen a two-year drought in Kenya, already suffering
from desertification. The forest tracts are a vital water
catchment area, ecologists say, and losing them could worsen the
cycle of drought and food shortages affecting Kenya. According to
official statistics, about 10 million of the nation's 30 million
people live in poverty in arid or semi-arid areas.
Environment Minister Francis Nyenze
defends the plan, saying it redefines forest boundaries in areas
already occupied by squatters, prevents further encroachment, and
gives land to the needy.
The practice of excising areas of
forest "started with the colonial government in 1933 and has
been going on since then as the need arises to settle poor,
landless people," the minister says.
Opponents of the plan, however, say
that prime forest land is being handed over by the government to
supporters as a way of currying favor before next year's expected
elections.
"Too bad those poor and needy
happen to actually be the rich and politically powerful of this
country," well-known ecologist and Green Belt movement
coordinator Wangari Maathai scoffs. "It is not the poor we
are dealing with here ... this is corruption," she says.
"In this country we encourage mismanagement of our resources,
and then we complain that we are poor."
Ms. Maathai was arrested earlier
this month for encouraging opposition to the government's decision
and spent a night in jail before being released without charges.
Critics of the government's
decision won a victory last weekend, after a court ordered a
temporary halt of the forest plan. But, pointing to past
experience, the opponents say the project will probably go forward
anyway. Shortly before the last elections in 1997, Mr. Moi flouted
a court injunction and reportedly handed out 700 unofficial title
deeds to forest land.
Lands Minister Joseph Nyagah,
meanwhile, is now discussing intentions to excise another 10,000
acres of forest beyond the acres already slated for settlement.
"What is happening in Kenya is
happening to a greater and lesser extent all over Africa," a
senior official at the Nairobi-headquartered United Nations
Environmental Program (UNEP) says, speaking on condition of
anonymity. "It is not a lack of awareness - just a lack of
long-term policy."
The problem, says the official, is
that in countries like Kenya, where there is both economic and
political instability - people think in the short term.
"Moi," he says, "is looking towards elections 2002
and not a day beyond - and that is tragic."
The majority of Kenya is semiarid
or desert, and depends on a few scattered catchments in
mountainous areas for water. Forests there regulate the water
supply, sponging it up during the rains and releasing it during
the dry season. Deforestation could reduce Kenya's water supply
and soil fertility, and affect operations at hydroelectric plants,
which, even under normal conditions, are not keeping up with the
nation's demand for energy.
Woodlands included in this year's
planned excision include Mount Kenya, Mount Elgon, and parts of
the Rift Valley Province.
The current drought and chronic
power and water shortages throughout the country have spurred
large IMF emergency loans. More than 4 million Kenyans are in need
of continuing emergency drought relief, according to the UN.
While it's clear UNEP does not want
a direct confrontation with Kenyan authorities, their calls for
re-thinking the deforestation plan are becoming increasingly blunt.
In a recent speech on the world's water supply, UNEP executive
director Klaus Toepfer - carefully avoiding singling out Kenya -
spoke of perils of indiscriminate deforestation.
"History provides grim
reminders that failure to manage our water resources properly has
caused the end of civilizations - in Mesopotamia, but also in
other countries, such asEthiopia, where the ancient civilization
of Aksum collapsed - partly because of deforestation and its
consequent water-related impacts," Toepfer said.
• Material from Agence
France Press was used in this report.
Copyright 2001 The Christian
Science Monitor. All rights reserved.
Link : http://search.csmonitor.com/durable/2001/03/23/fp7s1-csm.shtml
|