Archive 2000

 

KHRC             ++ URGENT ACTION ++               

Kenya Human Rights                                                                                                             Commission                                                                                                 

P.o. Box 41079

Nairobi.

Tel. 254-2-574998/9 , /576065

Fax 254-2-574997

email:   Khrc@africaonline.co.ke

Urgent action

08.04.2000  

Imminent violent displacement and eviction of the Ogiek Forest People in Tinet Forest area of Molo in Nakuru District, Rift Valley Province, Kenya.

Proposed Action

Please write a letter to the President of Kenya, Mr. Daniel . T. arap Moi, asking him to take all the necessary measures to stop the imminent eviction and harassment of the members of the Ogiek community and their supporters, to ensure that action is taken against those responsible for  and involved in harassment of members of the Ogiek community. Further, ask that the settlement process of the Ogiek is speeded up and court cases filed by the Ogiek are heard expeditiously. Please send a copy to the Chief Justice - Mr. Bernard Chunga, Attorney General- Mr. Amos Wako and Chairman of the Land Review Commission - Mr. Charles Njonjo. Do not forget to add your address and name at the top of your letter.

Background

The Ogiek people are a minority forest dwelling community residing in the Mau forest and Mt. Elgon forest. In 1996, their population was estimated at around 20,000 people. There are four main clans that form the Ogiek:

Tyepkwererek Clan which occupied the forests South-Eastern of Mau forest from Lake Nakuru and southwards in the areas of

           (a)  Sururu forest- named after the Ogiek traditional chief Sururu Olekiwanja,

           (b) Likia forest- named after clan inhabitant known as Likyo,

           (c) Logoman forest - named after plants which are common in the area called Logoma,

           (d) Teret (Tiritap Suswek) forest.

Morisionik Clan occupied the forest areas of

            (a) Nessuit (Nesoit- a sacred stone in Nessuit after which it was named,

            (b) Elburgon(Lembega) forest,

            (c) Marioshoni forest- named after the occupying clan Marisionik,

            (d) Keringet forest.

Kipchor’Ngwonek Clan- occupied forest areas in the West and North of Mau forest

            (a) Molo ( Mololo) forest,

            (b) Bararget forest,

            (c) Keringet forest.

Ogiek OP Tinet (OM) - Occupied forest areas in the South-West Mau forest as follows-

            (a) Kerisoi(Kuresoy),

            (b) Tinet forest,

            (c) Ndoinet forest,

            (d) Kiptagich forest,

             (e) Karantit forest,

             (f) some parts of Olenguruone

The Mt. Elgon Forest group occupied the forest area around Chepyuk .

N.B. The Ogiek people like other Kenyans had a well defined communal/customary tenure based on the clan/family holding of land. The unfortunate fact is that today the above mentioned areas do exist but the Ogiek have been pushed in the last forest belt of the former mighty Mau and Mt. Elgon forest. Their effort to hold on the disappearing forests is being challenged by the state which has systematically degazetted the forest areas and allocated big parcels of former forest lands to the ruling elites, in addition to licensing logging in the forests to the level of total deforestation.

The Ogiek have lived in the highland forests since time immemorial. This have been their natural habitat even when Kenya was first incorporated as a British Colony in 1895. However, the process of territorial seizure and loss of Ogiek forest land began in 1939 and continues today. Since 1939, there have been attempts by successive political regimes in Kenya to remove the Ogiek from their ancestral homelands, often forcibly.

These governments-both colonial and post-colonial have tried to obliterate the Ogiek land security by treating them as lawless trespassers in the forest lands in question. But, the Ogiek people have continuously struggled to avert total dispossession and possible danger of imminent extinction, by pursuing their territorial security and ultimately their survival through seeking affirmative action of protection with regard to access to and use of their forest land and other natural resources therein[2]. In this pursuit the Ogiek today are able to identify their homelands in both in Mau and Mt. Elgon forests.

Reasons for the Hotline Intervention

Kenya ratified not only the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights but also the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and is therefore obliged by international law to respect, protect and fulfill the rights of the Ogiek people to their settlement and natural habitat as a forest dwelling minority. The State must be open about the grievances of marginalized people like the Ogiek and formulate and implement environmental law, and policy framework that take into account the security of currently or potentially disadvantaged groups. Other than the forest department being used to threaten the Ogiek community with imminent eviction, it should instead carry out integral programmes with a range of strategies and responses to ensure their territorial security and, ultimately, their survival.

The extreme sloppiness and lack of political will to implement the resettlement of the Ogiek within their natural habitat have denied them the realisation of their economic and social rights. The following are some of the noticeable violations in the Ogiek case:

  • the right to guaranteed security of tenure by way of an assured right to reside and settle,

  • the right not to be dispossessed from one’s home and surrounding,

  • the right to settle in a healthy, safe and clean environment,

  • the right to natural resources,

  • the right to self-expression in matters of evictions, and

  • the right of gender equality in all dimensions of land and housing process outlined above.

The Ogiek case also brings out the following as observed failures of state responsibility:

  •         Insecurity of home, land and person: The unwillingness of the Kenyan state to give security of tenure to the Ogiek forest dwellers that have been forced by circumstances to live without title; and inability to protect them from forced evictions in 1939-1941, 1977, 1980-1981, 1985 and now threatened with another imminent eviction.

  •         The abuse of law: Inability to adopt legislations that do not contain loopholes and are not open to misuse. Or where effective legislations exist to protect the rights of the majority of residents, the inability to implement them.

  •         Inability to control market forces: The government has totally exhibited inability to control the ravages of unbridled market speculation of land and especially forest lands, thereby forcing the Ogiek people to live in increasingly marginal and insecure areas.

  •         The prevalence of forced evictions: Inability to control forces that lead to evictions coupled with inability to halt forced evictions or rein in forces of state(police, administration police and general service unit) that promote direct violence in carrying out forced evictions through use of brutality.

  •         Inability of the Kenyan government to recognise the inherent critical role of the Ogiek in conservation of their forest habitat through their cultural patterns that protect and sustain the forest cover.

  •         Non-compliance with national and international legal human rights instruments: The Kenyan government has continued to abrogate its role to fulfill constitutional duties and international legal human rights obligations that protect the Ogiek housing and land rights. Cumulatively the continued prevalence of this phenomena point to a failure of governance that leads to exclusion, dispossession and violent evictions becoming endemic to our society.

Lastly, as long as the Ogiek people have no guarantee to their natural habitat, their human rights will continue to be violated. In order to avoid a further intensification of violence, it is important to pressure the Kenyan authorities at this moment to protect the Ogiek community against harassment and imminent eviction by speeding up the formalised settlement process.

End of the Action: 08.04.2000

Addresses:       Daniel. T. arap Moi

                        Office of the President, Harambee House

                        P.o. Box 30510

                        Nairobi.

                        Tel: 227411

                        Fax 337340

 

                        Amos Wako

                        The Attorney General

                        State Law Office

                        P.o. Box 40112

                        Nairobi.

                        Tel: 227461

 

                        Bernard Chunga

                        The Chief Justice

                        Law Courts,

                        P.o. Box 30187

                        Nairobi.

                        Tel: 221221

                        Fax 333449

 

                        Charles Njonjo

                        The Chairperson

                        Land Review Commission

                        c/o Ministry of Lands& Settlement

                        P.o. Box 30450, Nairobi.

 

OGIEK HOME