|
Forest
Reserve – FR (Notice no.) |
Total
area FR in ha (as per year) |
Proposed
excision area (ha) |
%
of total FR |
Status
and location of the area |
Impact |
Official
purpose of excision[1] |
|
Eastern
Mau (889) |
64,971
(99) |
35,301.01 |
54.3 |
·
Affected
area is catchment for Lake Nakuru and Lake Baringo. ·
Area
was mainly plantation (~85%) and natural forest (~15%); at present
mainly settlements (~75-85%) with plantation (~10-20%) and some
natural forest (~5%). ·
Area
includes Sururu, Likia, Teret, Nessuit, Mariashoni and Baraget. ·
Njoro,
Nderet, Makalia, Naishi, Lamudhiak and Molo rivers were permanent, but
are seasonal rivers now. ·
Altitude:
2300-3000 metres. |
·
Soil
erosion ·
Reduced
stream flow ·
Drying
out and siltation of Nakuru and Baringo lakes ·
Loss
of potential for timber production and industrial investment ·
Water
stress ·
Increased
flood hazard ·
More
pronounced microclimatic conditions (higher day temperatures and lower
air humidity). |
Settlement
of Ogieks (original forest dwellers) |
|
South-western
Mau (890) |
83,395
(95) |
22,797.19 |
27.3 |
·
FR
is catchment for River Sondu. ·
Affected
area is mainly indigenous forest (~90%), with some plantations (~5%)
and some settlement (~5%); ·
Area
is located around Keringet, Tinet, and Ndoinet. ·
Altitude:
2600-2850 metres |
·
Frost
due to loss of essential micro-climate moderation in tea-growing areas
·
Reduced
flow and siltation at Sondu-Miriu hydro-power station ·
Increased
siltation of Lake Victoria ·
Soil
erosion ·
Increase
flood hazards and droughts downstream ·
Loss
of unique plant and animal species ·
Loss
of medicinal plants and potential genetic resources. |
Settlement
of Ogieks (original forest dwellers) |
|
Marmanet
(895) |
23,327.6
(94) |
2,837.4 |
12.2 |
·
Affected
area was plantation forest with pockets of indigenous areas; at
present cleared or settled to a large extent. ·
Located
near Nyahururu town, on both sides of the Rumuruti road. ·
Area
is part of the elephant corridor between Rumuruti and Marmanet FR. ·
Altitude:
2600 metres |
·
Loss
of potential for timber production ·
Reduced
stream flow ·
Increased
human-wildlife conflicts ·
Frost
due to loss of micro-climate moderation. |
Turkana
migrants and Nandis |
|
Mt.
Kenya (894 & 896 & 897)[2] |
200,870.9
(94) |
(a)
196.05 |
0.9 |
·
Mostly
settled in Ragati, apart from a portion of 24 ha of indigenous forest. ·
Affected
area was NRC area before. ·
Altitude:
2000 metres |
·
Soil
erosion ·
Reduced
stream flow ·
Loss
of potential for timber production |
Landless
who were settled in 1982-84 |
|
(b)
912.1 |
·
Most
areas in Ndathi, north of Segana river, were under NRC but are settled
at present. ·
Altitude:
2200 metres. |
·
Soil
erosion ·
Reduced
stream flow ·
Loss
of potential for timber production |
Landless
who have been settled already |
|||
|
(c)
717.0 |
·
Sagana
II in Hombe is indigenous forest / plantations of Muhugu, Cypress,
Eucalyptus and cleared but not settled areas. ·
Affected
area includes an elephant corridor and a steep ravine. ·
A
community fence has recently been completed to reduce human-wildlife
conflicts. ·
Altitude:
2100 metres. |
·
Elephant
migration corridor to Thigu Forest will be cut off ·
Loss
of capital investment (fence) ·
Increasing
human-wildlife conflict ·
Loss
of other biodiversity ·
Soil
erosion ·
Siltation
of Segana river and power plants on the Tana river. |
Squatters,
Mathira Technical school, and people to compensate for land given to
Ngandu Girls school. |
|||
|
Kapsaret
(902) |
1,194.2
(94) |
1,194.2 |
100 |
·
As
of February 2000, area was mostly forest plantations (~70%) and
indigenous forests (~5%) with cleared patches (~25%). ·
Altitude:
2200 metres. |
·
Loss
of potential for timber production |
Squatters |
|
Western
Mau (890 & 891) |
22,885.3
(94) |
(a)
712.5 |
4.5 |
·
Area
affected is a continuation of proposed South-western Mau excision and
comprises plantation and indigenous forest. ·
Area
is not yet settled. ·
Altitude:
2600 metres |
·
Frost
due to loss of essential micro-climate moderation in tea-growing areas
·
Reduced
flow and siltation at Sondu-Miriu hydro-power station ·
Increased
siltation of Lake Victoria ·
Soil
erosion ·
Increase
flood hazards and droughts downstream ·
Loss
of unique plant and animal species ·
Loss
of medicinal plants and potential genetic resources. |
Settlement
of Ogieks (original forest dwellers) |
|
(b)
323.7 |
·
Affected
area is a cleared plantation forest, located at the northern en of
Western Mau FR. ·
Forest
is part of Nyando river catchment. ·
Altitude:
2400 metres. |
·
Loss
of water catchment ·
Loss
of potential for timber production ·
Soil
erosion |
Tea
research centre (is area not too high for tea?) |
|||
|
Molo
(901) |
901.6
(94) |
901.62 |
100 |
·
Area
was plantation (~80%) and indigenous forest (~20%). Area has been
settled already. |
·
|
Land
clash victims |
|
Northern
Tinderet (898) |
26,097
(95) |
788.3 |
3 |
·
FR
is a catchment for Yala and Nyando River. ·
Other
information on affected area is not accessible. |
·
Not
identified. |
? |
|
Nakuru
(892) |
618.9
(94) |
270.5 |
43.7 |
·
Consists
mostly of scrub land; a small area was plantation forest. ·
Affected
area is called Milimani, located on the way to the Menengai crater and
development is on-going. ·
Altitude:
2300 metres |
·
Soil
erosion ·
Loss
of potential for timber production ·
Increased
flood hazard in Nakuru town |
? |
|
Mt.
Londiani (899) |
29,682.4
(94) |
124.9 |
0.4 |
·
Plantation
forest |
·
Loss
of potential for timber production ·
Soil
erosion |
Expansion
of Molo township, including a Trading Centre[3] |
|
Nabkoi
(893) |
3,014.5
(94) |
74.11 |
2.5 |
·
FR
comprises of indigenous and plantation forests. ·
Other
information on affected area is not accessible. |
·
Not
identified. |
Two
schools[4] |
|
South
Nandi (900) |
19,502.2
(94) |
34.59
|
0.2 |
·
Mostly
indigenous forest ·
Important
Bird Area for several threatened species |
·
Loss
of biodiversity and forest environmental services |
?
(Not for settlements) |
|
Total |
476,460.6 |
67,185.17 |
14 |
|
|
|
[1] The fear is that those who will benefit officially are not the beneficiaries in practice or not the only ones. From the past it is known that local administration, local elite and well-connected people are benefiting.
[2] The supplement (no. 9) of the same gazette (16/02/2001) contains legal notice no. 29 on the excision of an area of 796.04 ha located near Sirimon. The intention of excision had been published in the Kenya Gazette of 23/10/1998 and was objected by the KFWG within the 28-days period.
[3] Should the township grow into the forest?
[4] Should schools be given forestland?