News 2008

 

EAC unable to intervene in crisis

Published on January 20, 2008, 12:00 am

EA STANDARD

By Ernest Mpinganjira

Kenya’s neighbours are prodding its current political impasse with a big stick. They are hesitant to be involved.

Tanzanian President Jakaya Kikwete, Burundi’s Pierre Nkurunziza and Rwanda’s Paul Kagame, have not publicly acknowledged Kibaki’s victory.

In a recent interview with the BBC, Kikwete summed the mood in the region as humbling.

"It is they (Kenyans) fighting one another. They are best placed to look for solutions to their own problems. We can only intervene when our interests are at stake or if they ask for our assistance."

The remarks are silent diplomatic blow to Kenya. Simply put, Kikwete and other leaders do not want to share in the embarrassment of a suspect victory.

The international community is considering more drastic action.

The European Union parliament has recommended suspension of aid to Kenya until the current political crisis is resolved. This decision was reached on Thursday after days of deliberations in Brussels and Belgium.

The US says it is reviewing its assistance to Kenya.

The current political deadlock over the disputed presidential election results is threatening to plunge the country into a deep economic crisis.

These rebukes are a major credibility setback for President Kibaki.

The world is watching Kibaki’s every move.

Thursday’s call by the EU parliament to member states to suspend development aid to Kenya, capped a week during which police were accused of killing protesters indiscriminately.

Human rights activists accuse the police of using live ammunition.

Reaction to imminent suspension of aid in Nairobi was quite startling. Government spokesman, Dr Alfred Mutua, scoffed at the threat, saying Kenya is a sovereign state and should not be dictated to by development partners.

After all, he said, Kenya’s 95 per cent budget is financed with domestic revenue. From Mutua and any other layman’s point of view, the EU threat is utter nonsense.

It was with similar ‘gung-ho’ diplomacy’ that President Robert Mugabe responded to Western countries when they cut economic links with Zimbabwe.

Ever since, Zimbabwe, once one of the strongest economies on the continent, has been in a free-fall – inflation. Its current inflation rate is 4,000 per cent and it is still rising.

Kenya’s economy is service-industry based, and therefore quite vulnerable to external factors. The tourism industry, which last year fetched the exchequer Ksh61 billion, is already reeling under the post-election despondency.

The Kenya Tourism Board has already raised the red flag following massive cancellation of hotel bookings by nearly 50 per cent in the first two weeks of this month, precipitating lay-offs.

The ‘Zimbabwe syndrome’ is damaging to key economic sectors. Tourist-source countries have issued travel advisories warning their citizens against non-essential trips to Kenya.

In just two weeks, there are reports that the sector has shed 20,000 direct jobs, and 120,000 indirect jobs would be affected if the poll impasse is not resolved in a month.

The industry has lost Sh4 billion since the post-election violence began on December 30. Investors in real estate estimate losses amounting to over Sh100 billion.

The losses in the construction sector resulting from torched property have not been worked out. The transport sector has also taken a beating from the post-election violence. The losses are projected to be monstrously high.

More shocks await the Government in the first quarter of this year.

Development partners have warned that it is not going to be ‘business-as-usual’.

Although they have not said openly, EU foreign ministers have reportedly been considering advising their governments to ban Kenyan ministers and senior Government officials from travelling to Europe.

During EU foreign ministers parley in Malta last week, one of the options – besides aid suspension – was to freeze bank accounts for ministers and senior Government officials. This is what has befallen senior officials in President Mugabe’s government.

In addition, Kenya’s ministers and senior government officials would be barred to the United States, Japan and Canada.

The image of the government was further dented when the Human Rights Watch (HRW) alleged on Thursday that most of the people who died in the post-election violence were executed by the police.

The allegations of police brutality – at the behest of the Government – have further cast doubts on the credibility of the presidential poll outcome. Outgoing Commonwealth Secretary-General Don Mackintosh said on Thursday the results did not measure up to international standards.

According to an HRW official, Mr Ben Lawrence, preliminary investigations show that most of those killed in the violence especially in Rift Valley, Nairobi, Nyanza and Western Provinces were executed by police.

Development partners are definitely going to cite reports on gross human rights violations to determine continued support for the Kibaki administration.

Isolated internationally, the Kenyan leader also risks being perceived at home as the president of one province. His inability to venture out of State House and engage the nation in discourse has widened the distance between the presidency and the electorate.

Despite the atrocities being committed in many parts of the country, Kibaki is ‘barricaded’ in State House, unable to face Kenyans to stamp out current mayhem. This has reinforced the perception in opposition ranks that "the guilty are afraid".

Initially, the United States, though its embassy in Nairobi, hailed President Kibaki’s re-election. However, the Statement Department retracted the congratulatory message when it emerged that the tallying process was flawed.

Ever since, there has been a chain reaction that threatens to make Kibaki a lame duck president.

The country’s isolation internationally had begun. At home, the president could be an unwelcome guest in some parts of the country.

All politics is local, so it is said. However, the Kenya situation is a little dicey, if unique. But, what happens in Nairobi is likely to have far-reaching implications in East Africa.

We cannot call Kenya a failed state. But the ethnic tensions are high.

 

OGIEK HOME